Products related to Disagreement:
-
Disagreement
This Element engages with the epistemic significance of disagreement, focusing on its skeptical implications.It examines various types of disagreement-motivated skepticism in ancient philosophy, ethics, philosophy of religion, and general epistemology.In each case, it favors suspension of judgment as the seemingly appropriate response to the realization of disagreement.One main line of argument pursued in the Element is that, since in real-life disputes we have limited or inaccurate information about both our own epistemic standing and the epistemic standing of our dissenters, personal information and self-trust can rarely function as symmetry breakers in favor of our own views.
Price: 17.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Disagreement : Politics and Philosophy
“Is there any such thing as political philosophy?” So begins this provocative book by one of the foremost figures in Continental thought.Here, Jacques Rancière brings a new and highly useful set of terms to the vexed debate about political effectiveness and “the end of politics.”What precisely is at stake in the relationship between “philosophy” and the adjective “political”?In Disagreement, Rancière explores the apparent contradiction between these terms and reveals the uneasy meaning of their union in the phrase “political philosophy”—a juncture related to age-old attempts in philosophy to answer Plato’s devaluing of politics as a “democratic egalitarian” process. According to Rancière, the phrase also expresses the paradox of politics itself: the absence of a proper foundation.Politics, he argues, begins when the “demos” (the “excessive” or unrepresented part of society) seeks to disrupt the order of domination and distribution of goods “naturalized” by police and legal institutions.In addition, the notion of “equality” operates as a game of contestation that constantly substitutes litigation for political action and community.This game, Rancière maintains, operates by a primary logic of “misunderstanding.” In turn, political philosophy has always tried to substitute the “politics of truth” for the politics of appearances. Disagreement investigates the various transformations of this regime of “truth” and their effects on practical politics.Rancière then distinguishes what we mean by “democracy” from the practices of a consensual system in order to unravel the ramifications of the fashionable phrase “the end of politics.” His conclusions will be of interest to readers concerned with political questions from the broadest to the most specific and local.
Price: 25.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
The Epistemology of Group Disagreement
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement.Debates in the epistemology of disagreement have mainly been concerned with idealized cases of peer disagreement between individuals.However, most real-life disagreements are complex and often take place within and between groups.Ascribing views, beliefs, and judgments to groups is a common phenomenon that is well researched in the literature on the ontology and epistemology of groups.The chapters in this volume seek to connect these literatures and to explore both intra- and inter- group disagreements.They apply their discussions to a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues.The Epistemology of Group Disagreement is an important resource for students and scholars working on social and applied epistemology; disagreement; and topics at the intersection of epistemology, ethics, and politics.
Price: 39.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment
The striking extent of religious disagreement suggests that religious conviction is very often the result of processes that do not reliably produce true beliefs.For this reason, many have argued that the only rational response to religious disagreement is to adopt a religious skepticism that eschews confident religious belief.Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment contests this skeptical conclusion, explaining how it could be rational to maintain confident belief even in the face of the epistemic worries posed by disagreement.John Pittard argues against the commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality that underlies the case for disagreement-motivated religious skepticism, while also critiquing approaches to disagreement that allow for the unproblematic privileging of one's first-person perspective.He emphasizes the importance of having rational insight into reasons that favor one's outlook; however, he challenges narrowly intellectualist accounts of insight, arguing that many of the rational insights crucial to assessing religious outlooks are not achievable through analytical reasoning, but only through relevant emotional experiences. In the second part of the book, Pittard considers the implications that accepting the impartiality requirement favored by "disagreement skeptics" has for religious commitment.He challenges the common assumption that a commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality would rule out confident religious belief.He further argues, however, that such an impartiality commitment would likely make it irrational to pursue one's favored form of religious life and might prevent one from rationally engaging in any religious or irreligious way of life whatsoever.This troubling conclusion gives reason to hope that the arguments against impartiality are correct and that one can justify conviction despite widespread disagreement.
Price: 19.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What are the topics of disagreement in your partnership?
In our partnership, the main topics of disagreement revolve around decision-making processes, communication styles, and work distribution. We often have differing opinions on how to approach certain tasks or projects, which can lead to conflicts. Additionally, our communication styles sometimes clash, with one partner preferring direct communication while the other values a more diplomatic approach. Finally, we sometimes struggle to evenly distribute the workload, leading to feelings of imbalance and resentment.
-
How do you deal with a disagreement in a partnership?
When faced with a disagreement in a partnership, I believe it is important to approach the situation with open communication and a willingness to listen to the other person's perspective. I would strive to understand their point of view and express my own thoughts and feelings calmly and respectfully. Finding common ground and working towards a compromise that benefits both parties is key to resolving conflicts in a partnership. Additionally, seeking input from a neutral third party or mediator can also help facilitate a constructive resolution.
-
What are the topics of disagreement in your relationship?
In our relationship, the main topics of disagreement are usually related to communication styles, financial decisions, and division of household responsibilities. We sometimes have differing opinions on how to effectively communicate with each other, which can lead to misunderstandings. Additionally, we may have different priorities when it comes to managing finances and budgeting. Lastly, we occasionally struggle to find a balance in sharing household chores and responsibilities, which can cause tension at times.
-
What are typical topics of disagreement?
Typical topics of disagreement can vary widely depending on the individuals involved, but common areas of contention include politics, religion, money, parenting styles, and lifestyle choices. These topics often involve deeply held beliefs and values, making them more likely to lead to disagreements. Communication, respect, and compromise are key in navigating these disagreements and finding common ground.
Similar search terms for Disagreement:
-
Mere Civility : Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration
A New Statesman Best Book of the YearA Church Times Book of the YearWe are facing a crisis of civility, a war of words polluting our public sphere.In liberal democracies committed to tolerating active, often heated disagreement, the loss of this virtue appears critical.Most modern appeals to civility follow arguments by Hobbes or Locke by proposing to suppress disagreement or exclude views we deem “uncivil” for the sake of social harmony.By comparison, mere civility—a grudging conformity to norms of respectful behavior—as defended by Rhode Island’s founder, Roger Williams, might seem minimal and unappealing.Yet Teresa Bejan argues that Williams’s outlook offers a promising path forward in confronting our own crisis, one that challenges our fundamental assumptions about what a tolerant—and civil—society should look like. “Penetrating and sophisticated.”—James Ryerson, New York Times Book Review“Would that more of us might learn to look into the past with such gravity and humility.We might end up with a more (or mere) civil society, yet.”—Los Angeles Review of Books“A deeply admirable book: original, persuasive, witty, and eloquent.”—Jacob T.Levy, Review of Politics“A terrific book—learned, vigorous, and challenging.”—Alison McQueen, Stanford University
Price: 21.95 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Why Are We Yelling? : The Art of Productive Disagreement
'This is a life-changing book. Read it three times and then give a copy to anyone you care about.It will make things better' – Seth Godin, author of This is Marketing'All you need is Buster Benson.His methods are instantly actionable, [and] his writing is funny and relatable' – Adam Grant, author of OriginalsWhy Are We Yelling is Buster Benson's essential guide to having more honest and constructive arguments. The way we argue is broken. Whether it’s about Brexit, the existence of ghosts, the best burger in the city or who’s allowed to sit in your favourite chair, we end up digging our heels in and yelling at one another or choosing to avoid heated topics entirely.There has to be a better way. Buster Benson, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur with two decades of experience facilitating hard conversations at some of the biggest tech companies in the world, recommends eight things to try in order to make disagreements more productive.By applying these eight new habits, we can flip frustrating, unproductive disagreements into ones that bear fruit and bring people closer together. In this book you'll master practical skills to make your disagreements more productive by:- Understanding four ways of disagreeing that are more valuable than simply ‘winning’ the argument- Identifying the kind of argument you’re having so you know how best to negotiate it- Articulating the best possible version of your opponent’s argument before attacking itWith this toolkit we can explore more possibilities and perspectives in the world, simply because we’ll no longer be afraid to wade into scary topics of conversation.
Price: 18.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Conflict Resilience : Negotiating Disagreement Without Giving Up or Giving In
Two former Harvard faculty—one an internationally-recognized negotiator and conflict management expert from Harvard Law, the other a leading behavioral neurologist and cutting-edge scientist from Harvard Med—join forces to introduce conflict resilience: the radical act of sitting in and growing from conflict to break the bad habits that sabotage our politics, workplaces, and most important relationships. Conflict is getting the better of us. From our homes and community centers to C-Suites and Congress, disagreements are happening everywhere, with increasing frequency, and are being treated like zero-sum games that allow little margin for error and even less room for productive conversations.This puts a tremendous and untenable strain on our most important relationships and institutions. Unable or unwilling to negotiate conflict with skill, we ignore it or avoid it for as long as possible; when we are forced to face it, we escalate everyday disagreements and temporary flare-ups as if they’re life-and-death.Neither approach addresses underlying issues, promotes stronger relationships, or yields satisfying results. But there is a solution: a combined skillset and mindset that Bob Bordone calls “conflict resilience”—the ability to sit genuinely with and grow from disagreement.In this powerful, hopeful book, he and renowned neurologist Joel Salinas, MD, combine the inner mechanics of conflict—literally what’s going on in our bodies and our brains during moments of distress—with a groundbreaking three-step framework for how to navigate it:NAME (& dig deep)EXPLORE (& be brave)COMMIT (& own the conflict)In a time of increasing polarization, where consensus, agreement, and problem-solving can sometimes feel elusive, Conflict Resilience provides practical solutions to a common dilemma: How do you handle disagreements and differences with integrity while finding a way to create strong, deep, and lasting relationships?Conflict Resilience is not another book about conflict resolution, nor is it about problem solving.Conflict Resilience combines practical applications of advanced conflict management and study of the human brain to teach anyone how to turn conflict and negotiation into an act of union.This book provides the most cutting-edge and scientifically-grounded tools for driving agreement when possible and for empowering you to disagree better when the differences cut deep and the relationships matter most.This is a chance to bring people together, and an invitation to radically transform how we interact with our friends and families, our co-workers, our students, and our neighbors—anyone with whom we find ourselves in disagreement.
Price: 25.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Disagreeing Agreeably : Issue Debates with a Primer on Political Disagreement
This book facilitates civil discussion of controversial political issues.Unique to this book is a section that explains how to discuss politics without feeling angry or hostile toward people who hold different beliefs.In addition, the book provides concise and accessible debates of contemporary policy issues including gun control, immigration, the Electoral College, voting, and affirmative action.For each topic, readers are shown that opposing arguments are based on values and concerns that are widely shared by most people regardless of their political leanings.Perfect for students, professors, and citizens alike, this book promotes civility without shying away from controversy.
Price: 37.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
Because of a disagreement about grammar.
Because of a disagreement about grammar, the two authors were unable to come to a consensus on how to structure their collaborative writing project. One author insisted on following a strict set of grammar rules, while the other preferred a more flexible and creative approach. As a result, they were unable to move forward with their project and had to part ways. This highlights the importance of clear communication and compromise when working with others on writing projects.
-
Because of network marketing, I have had a disagreement with my best friend.
Network marketing can sometimes strain relationships, especially when friends feel pressured to join or buy products. In my case, my best friend and I had a disagreement because I felt like they were not supportive of my new venture in network marketing. They felt like I was constantly trying to sell to them and it created tension in our relationship. However, we were able to talk it out and set boundaries, which helped us move past the disagreement and maintain our friendship.
-
At what point of disagreement would a relationship no longer be meaningful?
A relationship may no longer be meaningful when there is a fundamental disagreement on core values, such as honesty, respect, or trust. If the disagreement leads to a lack of mutual understanding and empathy, and the inability to find common ground or compromise, the relationship may become unsustainable. Additionally, if the disagreement leads to constant conflict and emotional distress, it may indicate that the relationship is no longer serving the well-being of both individuals.
-
What is the disagreement with my psychotherapist?
It's important to have an open and honest conversation with your psychotherapist about the disagreement. It could be related to the treatment approach, goals, or the therapeutic relationship itself. It's important to communicate your concerns and listen to your therapist's perspective as well. If the disagreement persists, it may be helpful to seek a second opinion or consider finding a new therapist who is a better fit for your needs.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.