Products related to Partisanship:
-
The Power of Partisanship
In The Power of Partisanship, Joshua J. Dyck and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz argue that the growth in partisan polarization in the United States, and the resulting negativity voters feel towards their respective opposition party, has far-reaching effects on how Americans behave both inside and outside the realm of politics.In fact, no area of social life in the United States is safe from partisan influence.As a result of changes in the media landscape and decades of political polarization, voters are stronger partisans than in the past and are more likely to view the opposition party with a combination of confusion, disdain, and outright hostility.Yet, little of this hostility is grounded in specific policy preferences.Even ideology lacks meaning in the United States: conservative and liberal are what Republicans and Democrats have labeled "conservative" and "liberal."Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz show how partisanship influences the electorate's support for democratic norms, willingness to engage in risk related to financial and healthcare decisions, interracial interactions, and previously non-political decisions like what we like to eat for dinner.Partisanship prevents people from learning from their interactions with friends or the realities of their neighborhoods, and even makes them oblivious to their own economic hardship.The intensity and pervasiveness of partisanship in politics today has resulted in "political knowledge" becoming an endogenous feature of strong partisanship and a poor proxy for anything but partisan behavior.Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz present evidence that pure independents are, in fact, very responsive to information because they are not biased by partisan elite cues and important and relevant political information is often local, contextual, and personal.Drawing on a series of original surveys and experiments conducted between 2014 and 2020, Dyck and Pearson-Merkowitz show how the dominance of partisanship as a decision cue has fundamentally transformed our understanding of both political and non-political behavior.
Price: 18.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
IMF Lending : Partisanship, Punishment, and Protest
This Element argues that governments allocate adjustment burdens strategically to protect their supporters, imposing adjustment costs upon the supporters of their opponents, who then protest in response.Using large-N micro-level survey data from three world regions and a global survey, it discusses the local political economy of International Monetary Fund (IMF) lending.It finds that opposition supporters in countries under IMF structural adjustment programs (SAP) are more likely to report that the IMF SAP increased economic hardships than government supporters and countries without IMF exposure.In addition, it finds that partisan gaps in IMF SAP evaluations widen in IMF program countries with an above-median number of conditions, suggesting that opposition supporters face heavier adjustment burdens, and that opposition supporters who think SAPs made their lives worse are more likely to protest.This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Price: 49.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
IMF Lending : Partisanship, Punishment, and Protest
This Element argues that governments allocate adjustment burdens strategically to protect their supporters, imposing adjustment costs upon the supporters of their opponents, who then protest in response.Using large-N micro-level survey data from three world regions and a global survey, it discusses the local political economy of International Monetary Fund (IMF) lending.It finds that opposition supporters in countries under IMF structural adjustment programs (SAP) are more likely to report that the IMF SAP increased economic hardships than government supporters and countries without IMF exposure.In addition, it finds that partisan gaps in IMF SAP evaluations widen in IMF program countries with an above-median number of conditions, suggesting that opposition supporters face heavier adjustment burdens, and that opposition supporters who think SAPs made their lives worse are more likely to protest.This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Price: 17.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Democratic Partisanship : Party Activism in an Age of Democratic Crises
Explores how democratic norms resonate with party activists, and with what implications for representative governmentCombines normative theories of democratic partisanship and the empirical study of political partiesContributes a novel theoretical framework for the empirical analysis of democratic partisanshipShowcases an innovative and replicable methodology for focus group discussion and analysisDraws on extensive original research conducted in France and Hungary with 117 political party membersStudies x number of political parties including the conservative Fidesz party and socialist MSzP in Hungary and Parti Socialiste (PS) and Union pour un Mouvement populaire (UMP) in FranceIncludes rare testimonies from within Fidesz, Hungary's governing radical right party since 2010Includes 30 graphic visualisations of key differences in the outlooks of participantsPolitical parties are caught in the crossfire of contemporary criticism.Some are accused of being excessively technocratic and removed from citizens' concerns, while others are attacked for their populist discourse and for pandering to the base instincts of constituents.But what ideal of partisanship do we have in mind when we blame parties for the ills of democracy? And how do real-world parties actually compare to this normative ideal?Democratic Partisanship bridges political theory and empirical study to answer these questions.It explores and compares how key democratic norms hailed by political theorists, such as good justification and respect for opponents, resonate with right-wing and left-wing party members in Hungary and France. Focusing on the partisan's perspective, the book explores how and why some party organisations reconcile the most contradictory democratic imperatives while others fail to uphold basic principles.Far from writing-off parties as intrinsically suspect, Democratic Partisanship makes an incisive case for a new partisan ethic in an age of democratic crises.
Price: 85.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
How can social communication and interaction be described?
Social communication and interaction can be described as the exchange of information, ideas, and emotions between individuals through verbal and non-verbal means. It involves the use of language, gestures, facial expressions, and body language to convey messages and establish connections with others. Social communication and interaction play a crucial role in building relationships, fostering understanding, and creating a sense of belonging within a community. It is a dynamic process that involves active listening, empathy, and the ability to adapt to different social contexts and cultural norms.
-
What is the difference between social communication and social interaction?
Social communication refers to the exchange of information through verbal and nonverbal means, such as speaking, gestures, and facial expressions, to convey thoughts, feelings, and ideas. On the other hand, social interaction involves the broader concept of engaging with others in a social setting, including activities such as playing, sharing, and collaborating. While social communication focuses on the exchange of messages, social interaction encompasses the overall dynamic of how individuals engage with one another in social contexts.
-
What is the difference between interaction and communication in social work?
Interaction in social work refers to the exchange of information, ideas, and emotions between the social worker and the client. It involves non-verbal cues, body language, and other forms of expression. Communication, on the other hand, is a broader concept that encompasses interaction but also includes the process of sharing and understanding information, thoughts, and feelings through verbal and non-verbal means. While interaction is a part of communication, communication involves a more intentional and purposeful exchange of information and understanding between the social worker and the client.
-
Why are there still lies in a partnership despite communication?
Lies can still exist in a partnership despite communication because individuals may feel the need to protect themselves or their partner from potential hurt or conflict. They may also fear the consequences of being honest about certain issues. Additionally, past experiences or insecurities can lead to a lack of trust, making it difficult for individuals to be completely open and honest with each other. It is important for partners to work on building trust and creating a safe and open environment for communication in order to minimize the presence of lies in the relationship.
Similar search terms for Partisanship:
-
Beyond the Water’s Edge : How Partisanship Corrupts U.S. Foreign Policy
Intense partisanship is a familiar part of the contemporary United States, but its consequences do not stop at the country’s borders.The damage now extends to U.S. relations with the rest of the world. Too often, political leaders place their own party’s interest in gaining and keeping power ahead of the national interest. Paul R. Pillar examines how and why partisanship has undermined U.S. foreign policy, especially over the past three decades.Placing present-day discord in historical perspective going back to the beginning of the republic, Beyond the Water’s Edge shows that although the corrupting effects of partisan divisions are not new, past leaders were often able to overcome them.Recent social and political trends and developments including the end of the Cold War, however, have contributed to a surge of corrosive partisanship.Pillar demonstrates that its costs range from the prolongation of war and crisis to the intrusion of foreign influence and the undermining of democracy.He explores the ways other governments respond to inconsistency in U.S. foreign policy, the consequences of domestic division for U.S. global leadership, and how the corruption of American democracy also weakens democracy worldwide.Pillar considers possible remedies but draws the sobering conclusion that entrenched political sectarianism makes their adoption unlikely.Offering insightful analysis of the decline of U.S. foreign relations, Beyond the Water’s Edge is an important book for all readers concerned about the state of the American political system.
Price: 30.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Beyond the Water’s Edge : How Partisanship Corrupts U.S. Foreign Policy
Intense partisanship is a familiar part of the contemporary United States, but its consequences do not stop at the country’s borders.The damage now extends to U.S. relations with the rest of the world. Too often, political leaders place their own party’s interest in gaining and keeping power ahead of the national interest. Paul R. Pillar examines how and why partisanship has undermined U.S. foreign policy, especially over the past three decades.Placing present-day discord in historical perspective going back to the beginning of the republic, Beyond the Water’s Edge shows that although the corrupting effects of partisan divisions are not new, past leaders were often able to overcome them.Recent social and political trends and developments including the end of the Cold War, however, have contributed to a surge of corrosive partisanship.Pillar demonstrates that its costs range from the prolongation of war and crisis to the intrusion of foreign influence and the undermining of democracy.He explores the ways other governments respond to inconsistency in U.S. foreign policy, the consequences of domestic division for U.S. global leadership, and how the corruption of American democracy also weakens democracy worldwide.Pillar considers possible remedies but draws the sobering conclusion that entrenched political sectarianism makes their adoption unlikely.Offering insightful analysis of the decline of U.S. foreign relations, Beyond the Water’s Edge is an important book for all readers concerned about the state of the American political system.
Price: 20.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
The Politics of the Cross : A Christian Alternative to Partisanship
Price: 21.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Commander in Chief : Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War
The constitutional balance of war powers has shifted from Congress to the president over time.Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief.In the nineteenth century, however, Congress was the institution that claimed and defended expansive war powers authority.This discrepancy raises important questions: How, specifically, did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic?Did that definition change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the Founding through 1917, Casey Dominguez’s Commander in Chief systematically analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribe to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief’s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer.But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief.They also tended to argue that a president of their own party should have broad war powers, while the powers of a president in the other party should be defined narrowly.Together, these two dynamics suggest that the conditions for presidentially dominated modern constitutional war powers were set at the turn of the twentieth century, far earlier than is often acknowledged.
Price: 59.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
Is such a relationship or interaction normal?
Yes, such a relationship or interaction can be considered normal depending on the context. In a professional setting, it is common for colleagues to have disagreements or conflicts that need to be resolved through communication. However, if the relationship becomes toxic or harmful, it may not be considered normal and should be addressed. It is important for individuals to communicate effectively and respectfully in order to maintain healthy relationships.
-
Is a partnership also a relationship?
Yes, a partnership is also a relationship. A partnership involves two or more individuals or entities coming together to work towards a common goal, and this requires communication, trust, and collaboration, which are all key components of any relationship. In a partnership, there is a mutual understanding and agreement between the parties involved, and they are bound by a shared commitment to the success of the partnership. Therefore, a partnership is not only a business arrangement but also a form of relationship.
-
What is the connection between nationalism and integration?
Nationalism and integration are interconnected as they both involve a sense of identity and belonging. Nationalism often emphasizes the importance of a shared national identity, culture, and history, which can either promote or hinder integration. When nationalism is inclusive and celebrates diversity, it can contribute to the integration of different groups within a society. However, when nationalism becomes exclusive and promotes a single, dominant identity, it can create barriers to integration and lead to social division. Therefore, the way nationalism is defined and practiced can have a significant impact on the process of integration within a society.
-
How is communication structured in a relationship?
Communication in a relationship is typically structured through verbal and nonverbal cues, active listening, and mutual respect. It involves both partners expressing their thoughts, feelings, and needs openly and honestly. Effective communication also includes giving and receiving feedback, being empathetic, and being willing to compromise. Establishing clear boundaries, setting aside time to talk, and being mindful of each other's communication styles are also important aspects of structuring communication in a relationship.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.